In a recent interview with a prominent media channel, actor Shine Tom Chacko delved into the prevailing gender pay disparities within the film industry, sparking a thought-provoking conversation on the often-debated issue of unequal remuneration. Tom Chacko emphasized that an actor’s salary is not solely determined by gender or acting prowess but is more influenced by star power and audience draw.
The discussion arose when the actor was asked about the substantial salary difference between actor Vijay and acclaimed actress Nayanthara, often referred to as the ‘Lady Superstar.’ Tom Chacko raised a pertinent question regarding whether other actors labeled as ‘Superstars’ would receive comparable remuneration to Vijay. He further underscored his point by citing the earnings of legendary actors such as Mammootty, Mohanlal, and Kamal Hassan, pondering why they might receive lower pay than Vijay if the title ‘Superstar’ was the sole determinant.
Challenging the conventional belief that higher pay correlates exclusively with superior talent or acting quality, Tom Chacko highlighted that the disparity in remuneration goes beyond gender biases. Drawing a compelling analogy, he rhetorically questioned whether the demand for alcohol is higher than that for the Bible, implying that market demand often dictates compensation, irrespective of inherent value or quality.
Shine Tom Chacko’s articulate commentary on gender pay equality has garnered widespread resonance, earning praise from netizens for his witty remarks and critical examination of industry norms. Netizens are applauding the actor’s insightful perspective on the long-debated question of whether remuneration is based on gender.
